There's No Clear Link Between Brain Cancer And Electromagnetic Fields, Says Largest Study Yet

Link Between Brain Cancer And Electromagnetic Fields

What are Electromagnetic Radiations?

Electromagnetic radiation in the form of electromagnetic waves such as gamma rays, X-rays, ultraviolet light, visible light, infrared radiation, microwaves, and radio waves. The radiation has magnetic and electric fields that are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation and travels without a supporting medium.

 

Image: Wikipedia

Electromagnetic radiation includes the kind of visible light waves emitted by everything from light bulbs to the Sun. Our eyes commonly react to light waves with a frequency between in the range of 430 and 770 terahertz.

Electromagnetic Radiations and Human Health

From cell phones to microwaves, the advanced world for all intents and purposes gleams with high-recurrence Electromagnetic Radiation (EMF).

Ultraviolet light near the higher end of that spectrum has been shown to damage our DNA, increasing the risk of skin cancer. More energetic waves, like X-rays and gamma rays, pose even more serious health risks.

Brain Tumors and EMF

In any case, lately, there's additionally been a worry that huge presentation to far gentler waves within a range of only a couple of kilohertz could infiltrate the body and furthermore cause medical issues, including the forceful neurological cancer glioblastoma.

Seven years ago, the World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer evaluated the state of research on the topic and came to the conclusion there was enough reason to classify radiofrequency EMF as a possible carcinogen.

Many still save judgment on exactly how safe these sorts of energy waves are, yet a touchy new epidemiological examination raises doubt about that wavering, finding no reason to trust any brain tumors have been caused by EMF exposure.

See Also: How Environmentally Friendly are Electric Vehicles? - Forestrypedia

Connection b/w Non-Ionizing Radiations and Brain Cancers

Research driven by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) in Spain has given the most point by point examination yet on the connection between non-ionizing radiation and brain cancers.
This isn't to state there's solid proof of a relationship. Or on the other hand much proof by any stretch of the imagination.

In any case, given the size of the conceivable effect and the way that radiofrequency EMF is so omnipresent in our innovation splashed scene, the WHO felt inclined to err on the side of caution.
The problem is that brain tumors aren't exactly the most common of cancers, to begin with. Measuring a person's history of EMF exposure with any real precision in today's world is also a nightmare. So definitively linking the two isn't a walk in the park.

Findings of The Research 

For this study, researchers dug into the existing scientific literature to come up with a matrix for estimating the amount of intermediate (3 kilohertz to 10 megahertz) radiation and radiofrequency (10 megahertz to 300 gigahertz) radiation subjects were exposed to in their homes and workplaces.
They used this source-exposure matrix to sort data from a study called INTERPHONE, which analyzed primary brain cancers and mobile phone use, comparing roughly 4,000 cases of glioma and meningioma with more than 5,000 controls.

Once the statistics were calculated, there was no sign of a correlation between having your head exposed to significant amounts of high-frequency EMF and primary brain tumours.

But unfortunately, we can't close the book on this one yet.

Disregarding the size of the examination, just a single in ten of the members managed moderately huge exposures to EMF in a radio recurrence go and just a single in a hundred to middle frequencies.
To put it plainly, the shortage of those uncovered members over the investigation practically rules out different kinds of factual arranging, and as helpful as the source-presentation network seems to be, regardless it depended on gauges that could have thought little of hazard comes about.

"Although we did not find a positive association, the fact that we observed indication of an increased risk in the group with most recent radiofrequency exposure deserves further investigation," says the study's first author, Javier Vila.

The Participants of The Research 

The individuals making up the study came from seven different countries and worked in a range of careers, including high exposure fields such as medical diagnostics, telecommunications, and radar engineering.

Such a controlled level of contextual investigation detail on such a large number of individuals is exceptional to the extent wellbeing considers on EMF exposure go.

"This is the largest study of brain tumors and occupational high-frequency EMF exposure to date", says the study's senior author Elisabeth Cardis.

The Conclusion 

Taken all together, the results indicate we shouldn't worry for now, but we do need to focus future efforts on making sharper tools to analyze any hypothetical risk.

There's also a need to tease apart specific features of potential risks, perhaps investigating the roles of different chemical reactions to EMF.

For most of us, it's all business as usual. There's still a lot more to investigate, but for now, you can consider your head is safe from the unseen radiance of our techno-rich modern world.

This research was published in Environment International.
Courtesy: ScienceAlert